Quantcast
Jump to content


Has anyone used myshopmanager.com?


Recommended Posts



I use it and it's wildly successful.

But.... 

Much of what they do is text message based, and no one ignores a text message. This is obviously a good thing, but people also don't like their text messages ignored. A lot of the text responses we get don't need an answer because it's a "how the car doing?" type message that gets a "Doing great, Thanks!" type of response. However, some of the messages will need to be responded to, which means that you have to read them all, and you have to do it in a timely manner.

For me, that means reading through 5-600 text messages a month. It's a lot to keep up with.  It's a fantastic system, but be ready.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, xrac said:

What does it cost?

I spend about $400 a month with them. There's a flat fee, then a "points" scheme for the text messages. I do a lot of volume, so I spend a fair amount, your mileage may vary.

I should also mention that they'll hound you for a while about using their full program. I only do the text messages and follow up emails with them. They do postcards and letters and gift cards as well. I have that handled through other services, so I stick with just their texts and emails.

While their text system works fantastic, I've noticed a huge uptick in out google review generation from their follow up emails. We've added about 50 new positive reviews in the last 3 months with them. I couldn't be happier about that aspect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have used them for over year now. Customers love the text part and I have been using the reminders for about a month , We also use some of their remade ads and they work well. The cost is $197 a month plus the points. I usually buy the 100,000 points for $950 and it lasts me about 3 to 4 months. You choose who you send too and what they get.

Great marketing tool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've used My Shop Manager for almost a year. I can tell you that most or our customers LOVE to be texted. Up to this point we have only used their automatic "campaign" for after service Thank-You's and we use it manually for appointment reminders. It has also been good for when you can't reach a customer and some customers are texting for appointments. They do have a lot of other retention campaigns for texting and emailing as well. 

So far My Shop Manager has been good to deal with and overall a decent experience. However, we had an issue last week with the program sending someincorrect messages and were NOT impressed with the way they handled it. We still have no idea if it is fixed or not or what caused it.  To be completely transparent, we us RO Writer and recently upgraded to version 2.0 and it is likely that has something to do with it.  No matter what, no one really seemed to be concerned with customers receiving texts about vehicles they don't own. It completely takes the personal touch out of what texting can offer and we are very concerned about the negative impact it could have caused on our customer base. 

In regards to texting customers, I'd say absolutely do it. My Shop Manager is reasonably priced and at least worth looking at. There are many services out there, so shop around and pick who suits you best.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Two questions if I may:

  1. Do the texts that go in/out of ShopManager.com use your existing shop telephone number, some other number or an email address?
  2. If not, does somebody have a good contact there that they could introduce me to that might be willing to discuss an integration?

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The text messages use a unique phone number. You're then sent an email notifying you of the text message. All of your text interaction is then done through your web browser.

I think you can contact anyone there. The salesman who first contacted me is not the same person who handles my account, so I think you can just call them and get a demo from whoever. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've used MyShopManager for a year or more and really like it. Up until recently I answered all the texts myself using my cell phone, anywhere I was even on trips. Pretty simple to do since each text response comes as an email. I now have trained my CR person to do it and made them responsible. I use a combination of texts, emails, and direct mail as follow up, all to our existing customers, and it works well. The text responses after the RO closes is a great way to interact with your customers. The price is very reasonable to me, compared with other things we spend marketing money on.

One thing I especially like is the system of contacts to get a first time customer to make a 2nd and 3rd visit. Works very well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Have you checked out Joe's Latest Blog?

    • By Joe Marconi in Joe's Blog
         4
      Typically, when productivity suffers, the shop owner or manager directs their attention to the technicians. Are they doing all they can do to maintain high billable hours? Are they as efficient as they can be?  Is there time being wasted throughout the technician’s day? 
      All these reasons factor into production problems, but before we point fingers at the technicians, let’s consider a few other factors.
      Are estimates being written properly? Are labor testing and inspections being billed out correctly? Are you charging enough for testing and inspecting, especially for highly specialized electrical, on-board computer issues, and other complex drivability work?  Is there a clear workflow process everyone follows that details every step from the write-up to vehicle delivery? Do you track comebacks, and is that affecting production?  Is the shop layout not conducive to high production? For example, is it unorganized, where shop tools, technical information, and equipment are not easily accessible to every technician?  Are you charging the correct labor rate and allowing for variables such as rust, vehicle age, and the fact that most labor guides are wrong? Also, is there effective communication between the tech and the service advisor to ensure that extra labor time is accounted for and billed to the customer? These are a few of the top reasons for low productivity problems. There are others, but the main point is to look at the entire operation. Productivity is a team effort.  Blaming the techs or other staff members does not get to the root cause in most cases.
      Maintaining adequate production levels is the responsibility of management to create the processes that will lead to high production while holding everyone accountable. 
  • Similar Topics

    • By TTP

      Premium Member Content 

      This content is hidden to guests, one of the benefits of a paid membership. Please login or register to view this content.

    • By ASOG Podcast
      Do This At AAPEX 2022 and Any Trade Show
    • By bantar
      While at the Ratchet and Wrench Management Conference, I was able to review most of the management software packages available.   I have a few observations to share that might be helpful.   Each software package has its own pluses and minuses, but, I see some high-level commonalities amongst them.
      At a high level, you can separate software packages into two groups based on age.    The longer a software package has been available, the more likely that many of its features are highly refined and give you the most controls.   The disadvantage of an older software package is that they are too busy keeping their customer base happy with fixes and minor features that they don't have time to take the leap of innovation (e.g. DVI).   If the platform is really old and/or they are not charging enough money monthly to have the revenue to hire a good team, they may not be able to completely rewrite their software to utilize newer technology features.  For these software packages, you are forced to change vendors to adopt new the new features.   On the other hand, if the software package is new, they go straight for the snazzy features and also, try to fix the perceived problems of the legacy software packages.   They excel in the basics, but lack the depth of feature functionality that only time brings.     Mind you, both types of companies are trying to reach feature parity.  New companies need to flush out features, adding complexity and older companies are working to build the snazzy features.    Both of these take time.
      For the record, I'm using Protractor.    I can tell you all of the good and bad of this package.   I used my in-depth knowledge of this program to compare it to the newer packages.   In other forums, the two main contenders for new appear to be:
      TekMetric ShopWare Other New: Shop Monkey AutoLeap Older More Mature Systems: Protractor Mitchell (I didn't look at this one) NapaTracs (I didn't look at this one) Many others not at this show I liked the snazzy new features that I saw in each new package, but quickly recognized that in my daily use, I'm using certain mature features that are not present in the new packages.
      Another observation is that each software package somewhat enforces a workflow methodology.  You can choose to fight their internal structures (and lose), or go with their model.   I noticed a few idiosyncrasies, but, they are all trending towards a seemingly similar workflow.   This requires scrutiny when selecting a software package.  The new guys are often pushing their "better way" as a solution to the problems of old.  For instance, ShopWare had a unique approach to canned jobs that deserves investigation that I didn't notice in other packages.  
      So, when shopping, make note of the real features that you must have.  Don't be fooled by the shiny new outer skin.  Balance it with your real needs.
      I do see that some of these new contenders are investing much money into development of new features, so over time, they will likely build the feature that you need today.   As well, some mature packages are investing in the future. 
      I will say this loudly.   Your software vendor must be charging you healthy monthly fees to have the money necessary to continue to innovate.  If you gravitate to the lowest price, features could take longer or never come.   Just like us, we must first survive before we can do good work and be able to pay the bills.
    • By Joe Marconi
      I recently read an article in Auto Success online, a publication for dealerships. It states that there is a market for used tires. I was never a fan of selling used tires. Link to article below. 
      Your thoughts? Comments? 
       
       
    • By Joe Marconi
      Years ago, I had a "No rehire rule." My thinking back then: If someone quits and I rehire them, does that send the right message to the other employees? That they can leave and I would take them back?  However, we are in different times.
      Employees, especially techs, have left their jobs in recent years, lured away by better pay, in many cases. But, these employees soon realized that a job (a career) is not all about the paycheck. 
      What would you do if an employee came back to you, asking for re-employment? 
       
       
       


  • By nptrb, in Automotive Industry,

    By nptrb, in Automotive Industry,

  • Our Sponsors



×
×
  • Create New...