Quantcast
Jump to content









Multiple Service Advisors


Recommended Posts

If your 1st service adviser has some tenure and you think he has some managerial skills, make him the "service manager" and have the new "service adviser" report to him. Let them figure out the work load. That's how it works in my shop. If that isn't that isn't the case you could split it up into two "teams" of 1 SA and 2 techs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are toying around with is having a parts manager. Got the idea from my mastermind group where some of the shops are doing this with great success. The parts manager can have less or more responsibilities but the gist is that they estimate parts (sometimes the whole ticket), order parts, perform returns and credits, warranties, help to dispatch work, dispatch parts, inventory, procurement of parts, handles vendor issues etc. It leaves the service advisors time to do what you want them to do which is SELL and CUSTOMER SERVICE. I think its an amazing idea because most of what my service advisors get frustrated with is their gigantic job description where they are responsible for everything front end. It can also open up opportunities to find amazing sales people that don't like backend work and also a parts manager that is not necessarily a people person. Its an option. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we have two and there is no need to assign techs to them or find a solution, it generally works out easily enough when customers walk up to the counter. We rarely see an imbalance. Plus, one is the service manager so he can delegate if needed.  We also have a parts guy but he only handles parts as they come in, if it is a wrong part, part inventory, part returns and tracking. We also have a body shop so he handles those parts as well.  He does not write up tickets, the service writers do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We hired a Parts / job Estimator approx 3 years ago - Nice thing it keeps estimates consistent , they can stay on top of who has what , pricing changes , new products available ,Stock needs ,  They learn how to to communicate with tech's for specific facts needed to find parts , They learn warranty's so we get the best warranty for dollars spent , They know time lines for parts , and can have all electronic look ups , Google  , Etc. , Communicate with Tech's what part really works and or not - Aftermarket or OE  , or TSB.

The Tech's turn their sheets into S/A's they then prioritize what needs sold and or can be by knowing clients better  , then that goes to Parts / Job Estimator .

We sell a lot of Big job's so it would hamper S/a's to do this and they do not stay consistent , they let emotions buy parts and who is their friend at part store not what normally best interest for shop or customer.  

In closing - The savings in parts cost alone should pay for their salary .

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We just went to two advisors a couple months ago. I made my current SA the service manager/operations manager, and I let them work out the work flow. They've tried different things, but I'm leaving it up to them. BTW, my ARO went up immediately since there is now time to slow the process down. I'm playing with the parts person idea, trying to use my previous asst SA as parts/admin. Still working it all out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Have you checked out Joe's Latest Blog?

         5 comments
      I recently spoke with a friend of mine who owns a large general repair shop in the Midwest. His father founded the business in 1975. He was telling me that although he’s busy, he’s also very frustrated. When I probed him more about his frustrations, he said that it’s hard to find qualified technicians. My friend employs four technicians and is looking to hire two more. I then asked him, “How long does a technician last working for you.” He looked puzzled and replied, “I never really thought about that, but I can tell that except for one tech, most technicians don’t last working for me longer than a few years.”
      Judging from personal experience as a shop owner and from what I know about the auto repair industry, I can tell you that other than a few exceptions, the turnover rate for technicians in our industry is too high. This makes me think, do we have a technician shortage or a retention problem? Have we done the best we can over the decades to provide great pay plans, benefits packages, great work environments, and the right culture to ensure that the techs we have stay with us?
      Finding and hiring qualified automotive technicians is not a new phenomenon. This problem has been around for as long as I can remember. While we do need to attract people to our industry and provide the necessary training and mentorship, we also need to focus on retention. Having a revolving door and needing to hire techs every few years or so costs your company money. Big money! And that revolving door may be a sign of an even bigger issue: poor leadership, and poor employee management skills.
      Here’s one more thing to consider, for the most part, technicians don’t leave one job to start a new career, they leave one shop as a technician to become a technician at another shop. The reasons why they leave can be debated, but there is one fact that we cannot deny, people don’t quit the company they work for, they usually leave because of the boss or manager they work for.
      Put yourselves in the shoes of your employees. Do you have a workplace that communicates, “We appreciate you and want you to stay!”
  • Similar Topics



  • Our Sponsors










×
×
  • Create New...