Quantcast
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The model that I am familiar with is a 60% gross profit on loaded tech wages. Loaded would include all taxes, workers comp insurance, benefits like health insurance, dental insurance, vacation pay, holiday pay, training costs, retirement contributions etc.

  • Like 1
Posted

The model that I am familiar with is a 60% gross profit on loaded tech wages. Loaded would include all taxes, workers comp insurance, benefits like health insurance, dental insurance, vacation pay, holiday pay, training costs, retirement contributions etc.

Thank you!

Posted

I would set your labor rate at 3.5x the highest paid tech. So as an example Joe tech makes $20/hr, you should charge $70. I've been using this strategy and it has worked out well. If you are just starting out anticipate what the techs pay will be in 24-36 months and use that figure. You don't want to keep changing your posted labor rate.

 

Parts gross profit margin (ignoring labor) needs to be close to 50% on average. Your chart above is great. Remember profit margin and markup are different. To achieve 50% GPM you would markup your part 100% or cost x 2.

 

I use the labor multiplier because it simplifies things, a tech that earns $20/hr probably costs $30/hr when you figure in all the expenses of not only insurance and taxes but soap, gloves, shop supplies, mistakes that cost you money. Its also important to charge for his/her time. The book might call for 1 hour to do a hub bearing, if he's hammering on it for 2 hours charge 2 hours. It seems simple but I hear owners crying all the time they can't make any money.

 

In the above example say your a nice guy, you charge 1 hour for a bearing and 50% on the part. Its your good customer so you throw him a 10% discount and use a cheap bearing. The part cost you $100, you charge $270 for the job. With the discount you got paid $243. Customer is very pleased. Minus $60 tech cost. Minus $100 for the part. Your shop made $83 on the job, assuming it took 2 hours that's basically an effective rate of $41/hr to pay overhead. If it costs $40/hr to keep the open sign on you made zero for yourself. The bearing fails under warranty 10 months later, customer is shaken up and is angry he paid over $200 and has the same problems. The labor time your not getting back and you also lose 2 additional hours to work on a new job so now it ended up costing you money to do that job. Nice guy 10 months ago is now the bad guy.

 

Let's revisit that same job. You insist on a OEM bearing or equivalent. $200 cost for the part, 2 hours labor. Now the job is $540. You need to present to the customer some valid reasons to justify charging this amount. It still takes the tech 2 hours. You still kept the open sign lit for 2 hours and paid your counter man. You made $280 or $100/hr money you actually keep*. The chance of failure under warranty is greatly reduced. The customer has long forgotten what he paid to get his car fixed because its still fixed. You are the nice guy now, really.

 

* after all expenses you might cut this number in half or worse.

 

Its important to have good percentages, but real money is what pays real bills and earns you a living. Every job needs to be scrutinized to maximize the real dollars earned, don't discount yourself out of business.

  • Like 7
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

We begin our estimating process by looking up the times in the national labor guide as published in our Mitchell software. The settings automatically bump the charged time by 33%. We setup a default that automatically assigns every generated labor line to a tech named Tech Assign. (It shows up as Assign, Tech) and that technician assigns costs to the job (as alfredauto suggested) by a calulation based off our highest paid technician's loaded payroll cost. We actually use a bump in that calculation also which helps to protect our bottom line against a techncian who is less than efficient on any particular job.

 

So, by this explanation, a job that takes 2.5 hours according to the guide (with all combinations & consideration for any overlapping service), is charged to the customer at 3.33 hours. Here's what happens:

 

Let's say that Joe, our highest paid technician, earns $23 per hour, flat rate. So of course, Joe's rate in the technican's setup screen indicates that he will cost $29.90 per billed labor hour with estimated taxes, workers' comp fees, etc. added in. The default technician, "Assign Tech" is also setup this way. The software suggests charging the customer 3.33 hours, or the amount of time in the guide multiplied by 133%. The default tech is given 2.5 pay hours, the customer is charged 3.33. Once the job is assigned, no matter which technician is paid for the job, the nature of the profit margin as it pertains to the associated labor costs can't change in a manner as to cause us to lose money on the job. In fact, if it's ultimately assigned to a tech that earns $17 flat rate (or $22.10 loaded), the additional $25.97 collected in labor fees is essentially unassigned, and bolsters the profit margin originally written in the estimate. Fair? Absolutely! If a less experienced tech is assigned a job, and has any struggles with it, our more senior staff is always happy to help, even for a few minutes to help get them past a difficult point, because the company can generously afford to pay that tech the additional time, ON TOP of what the assigned tech is earning, because it's a built-in contingency.

 

It also gives us a very powerful advantage...ANYtime one of our technicians runs into a problem on a job that was unforseen, or requires additional effort or steps to complete the work, our staff can, at their discretion, request additional time on a job, and given that our effective labor rate weekly is generally higher than our posted rate (due to all the calculations above) we can almost ALWAYS give that time generously to our staff and encourage them to continue to do the best they can, taking their time, and not cutting any corners...without going back to the customer for more time/money.

 

Our parts matrix is a simpler assessment. We generally try to get a 100% markup or greater, representing a 50-60% profit margin on the parts. Now of course, in all fairness to our customers, we can't rely on the software to tell us what to charge without first assessing a completed estimate and diligently making sure the total estimated cost represents a fair price. Anytime there's any question about whether our price is competitive, our service advisors are encouraged (BEFORE presenting the estimate to the customer) to check some of the various publicly available resources such as AutoMD, or RepairPal to see how we size up. All in all, we tend to average a gross profit margin of between 60-64% on the written estimates weekly.

 

We've learned that it's a MUCH better proposition to charge much more than the discount/hack shops, and only nominally more than the reputable shop. In any given set of circumstances, it frees us up to always be ready and willing to give back to our customers when it's truly warranted, or even toss in some free, ancillary services on the visit, or on repeat visits.

 

Just one man's opinion.

  • Like 4
Posted

.......Anytime there's any question about whether our price is competitive, our service advisors are encouraged (BEFORE presenting the estimate to the customer) to check some of the various publicly available resources such as AutoMD, or RepairPal to see how we size up...

 

 

 

Great idea!

  • Like 1
Posted

stowintegrity, how do you tech pay rate compare to your posted hourly? I like your idea however I feel that you would have to be working with a lower posted hourly to justify a 33% matrix markup on your labor rate to stay competitive with automd and repairpal quotes.

  • Like 1
Posted

stowintegrity, how do you tech pay rate compare to your posted hourly? I like your idea however I feel that you would have to be working with a lower posted hourly to justify a 33% matrix markup on your labor rate to stay competitive with automd and repairpal quotes.

The lowest profit margin on one hour of labor, with the bump, as I called it, is about 70%, as our posted discount rate is $80. The important factor, though, is that while we answer the question regarding what our "rate" is freely, we don't sell hours, or time. Heck...sometimes it feels like we don't even sell parts...we sell solutions to problems.

 

Here's a completely hypothetical situation: If the going rate for a brake job in town is $150, and the range indicated on Repairpal is between $120 and $200, anything inside of that range is understandable. However, what if I told you (up front) that in order for us to do that job, we would have to charge $250, that the parts are all warrantied for 3 years, 36,000 miles, and that although it will take a day or so to finish it, we can offer you a brand new 2015 car to drive for the day at no additional charge, and this service package comes with a gift card for lunch at Subway? I'm making this up, of course, but my point is that price is truly only ONE consideration as to why they should do business with you. Instead of figuring out how to come down to "match" the competition's pricing...figure out how to stand up, and offer more to your customers. You'll build loyalty that your competitors will be unable to infiltrate/steal.

 

We offer one of the most valuable selling propostiions in our market, founded on the way our customers are treated, and are continuing to seek out over-the-top methods of earning their continued loyalty. I know I'm off topic now, but pricing, service, & offering...it's all connected. If they want a cheap price, I smile, shake their hand, and promise them that if they look around, I know they'll find it. It's a beautiful thing when you can know your intended market so well that it becomes easy to identify when someone you're trying to help just doesn't fit the mold. Stop wasting time & money worrying about trying to fit square pegs into round holes. It's expensive, frustrating, and not as profitable. The ONLY time it's more profitable to approach this any differently is if you happen to be the cost/price leader in town. And even if you are, it's a fragile mountain of gold you're sitting on.

 

Just one man's opinion.

  • Like 2
Posted

Thanks for your post. I agree with you in terms of offering value other than price in considerstion for our services. We are almost always higher than the highest "average" estimate according to repairpal. My question to you was directed to how you justify keeping up with a 70% profit margin in ratio to tech pay. My labor rate currently is 116.97 however I will be bumping it up to 119.97 to keep up with offering my technicians competitive pay while keeping our margins. I like the idea of using a multiplicative for the customer rate while keeping the "posted" rate competitive. I will have to do some math with my numbers.

Posted

My question to you was directed to how you justify keeping up with a 70% profit margin in ratio to tech pay.

 

My labor rate currently is 116.97 however I will be bumping it up to 119.97 to keep up with offering my technicians competitive pay while keeping our margins.

I'm not sure what you mean, I'm sorry, (but I think you & I are in agreement) Instead of starting with considering what a job may cost anywhere else, our process is reverse engineered, in a sense. Determine what you want to pay your highest paid technician, then work the math backward to determine what you'll need to charge to get the margin you need. Comparing it to publicly available averages or other data is just the furtherst attempt we try to make to make certain we're being as competitive as we can. My bottom line pricing to my customers is justified by clearly stating what value they get for the services I propose. My technicians? I justify what I pay THEM, based on performance, experiences, and talent. As for the ratio between the two, I've made it no one's business but my own. (And all of you nice people, lol)

 

If your labor rate is $117, you should be able to pay your top technician as much as $33 an hour, loaded, and still keep your margins healthy, according to my application of this system. The truth lies in the simplicity of this: Profit is not a dirty word. Customers and technicians alike are universally important to my success, of course. But I further justify the ratio to both groups by letting them know that there are more bills to pay than just labor & parts. IF I can't profit according to my business' needs, I can't stay afloat...and then I'm of no service to ANYONE.

 

You sound like you have a firm grasp on this, I'd like to hear how your proposed labor change helps your numbers!

 

Tony

Posted

stowintegrity, how do you tech pay rate compare to your posted hourly? I like your idea however I feel that you would have to be working with a lower posted hourly to justify a 33% matrix markup on your labor rate to stay competitive with automd and repairpal quotes.

He's asking the following:

If your highest tech is paid $30/hr, and your posted rate is $100/hr, you're making 70% GP on labour.

Now when you estimate jobs, you multiply the labour guide hours by 1.33, essentially charging $133/hr on the labour guide's hours.

This is now 77.5% GP on labour vs the industry standard 70%.

If your customers are willing to pay this, great! However, compared to other shops your estimates will end up being very high, especially on long/labour intensive jobs.

Have you reduced your original 70% GP to compensate for this (maybe posting $80 or $90/hr on a $30 labour rate) so your estimates aren't really high?

Like mspec, I also like the idea of using a multiplier on the labour guide, but I feel that 10-15% might be a lot more reasonable to keep your estimates within range of other shops instead of 33%?

Posted

He's asking the following:

If your highest tech is paid $30/hr, and your posted rate is $100/hr, you're making 70% GP on labour.

Now when you estimate jobs, you multiply the labour guide hours by 1.33, essentially charging $133/hr on the labour guide's hours.

This is now 77.5% GP on labour vs the industry standard 70%.

If your customers are willing to pay this, great! However, compared to other shops your estimates will end up being very high, especially on long/labour intensive jobs.

Have you reduced your original 70% GP to compensate for this (maybe posting $80 or $90/hr on a $30 labour rate) so your estimates aren't really high?

Like mspec, I also like the idea of using a multiplier on the labour guide, but I feel that 10-15% might be a lot more reasonable to keep your estimates within range of other shops instead of 33%?

 

I see your point. I guess what's worked for us so far has been that although we use the process I've been describing to write our estimates, that in the end, I guess we do, in fact, adjust the labor $ our POS assigns if we feel the job hasn't been written in such a way as to still be able to justify the price over the value our customers are receiving.

 

It makes me wonder what mistake is made more often? Do more shops tend to undercharge, either fearfully or thinking that a low price is the best way to generate volume, or do you think there are more that error on the side of setting price too high, ignoring the value propostiion as perceived by those they hope to serve?

 

I guess I really, truly want to know that we're charging what we must in order to be highly profitable, but not so much that our customers try to lump us in with the less-than-reputable shops that price-gouge.

 

I'm not certain where I first heard it, but we've made it part of our service writer training to ask the following question: "When considering parts/labor costs passed on to our customers, how much should you charge?" The simple answer is to let the trainee know that on every estimate they should charge systematically AS MUCH as they can, minus JUST ENOUGH to make absolutely certain that our customers can't help but see the value in the offering, and are delighted to write the check.

 

This is as good as anywhere to ask the question: When considering ONLY the parts/labor equation...what is your shop's weekly goal for gross profit margin? In considering a week's worth of service completed, what's the lowest and highest acceptable margin? (Assuming you'd rather not have a service writer try to write all your service at 95% GPM, giving you a bad reputation for being overpriced)

 

Curious.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Available Subscriptions

  • Have you checked out Joe's Latest Blog?

         0 comments
      It always amazes me when I hear about a technician who quits one repair shop to go work at another shop for less money. I know you have heard of this too, and you’ve probably asked yourself, “Can this be true? And Why?” The answer rests within the culture of the company. More specifically, the boss, manager, or a toxic work environment literally pushed the technician out the door.
      While money and benefits tend to attract people to a company, it won’t keep them there. When a technician begins to look over the fence for greener grass, that is usually a sign that something is wrong within the workplace. It also means that his or her heart is probably already gone. If the issue is not resolved, no amount of money will keep that technician for the long term. The heart is always the first to leave. The last thing that leaves is the technician’s toolbox.
      Shop owners: Focus more on employee retention than acquisition. This is not to say that you should not be constantly recruiting. You should. What it does means is that once you hire someone, your job isn’t over, that’s when it begins. Get to know your technicians. Build strong relationships. Have frequent one-on-ones. Engage in meaningful conversation. Find what truly motivates your technicians. You may be surprised that while money is a motivator, it’s usually not the prime motivator.
      One last thing; the cost of technician turnover can be financially devastating. It also affects shop morale. Do all you can to create a workplace where technicians feel they are respected, recognized, and know that their work contributes to the overall success of the company. This will lead to improved morale and team spirit. Remember, when you see a technician’s toolbox rolling out of the bay on its way to another shop, the heart was most likely gone long before that.
  • Similar Topics

    • By champtires
      Champtires has dropped prices on more than 8,000 tires. The markdowns – which are mostly between 15 and 20 percent per tire – are on top of the company’s everyday low prices for high-quality used and take-off tires.
      BF Goodrich, Bridgestone, Continental, General Tire, Goodyear, Hankook, Michelin, Pirelli and many other brands are included in the price drops.
      Discount Examples:
      CONTINENTAL PROCONTACT TX 245/45-19 98 H with 8/32 tread
      Regular Price: $146.67
      Markdown Price: $126.27
      FALKEN PRO G5 CSV 235/60-18 107 V with 10/32 tread
      Regular Price: $92.62
      Markdown Price: $74.10
      FIRESTONE DESTINATION LE 3 275/45-20 110 H with 8/32 tread
      Regular Price: $113.40
      Markdown Price: $92.99
      MICHELIN_DEFENDER2 TAKEOFF 215/45-17 91 H (less than 50 miles driven)
      Regular Price: $165.19
      Markdown Price: $140.41
      YOKOHAMA YK-CTXv225/60-18v100 H with 8/32 tread
      Regular Price: $53.86 
      Markdown Price: $43.09

      To find tires that are included in the sale, start by searching at www.champtires.com. Tires that have been discounted will have a new price displayed in red.
      Free shipping is included on all orders placed through Champtires.com.
      Established in 2009, Champtires is one of the leading sellers of premium used tires in the United States and also sells take-off tires (driven for 50 miles or less) and new tires. Headquartered in West Mifflin, PA, Champtires operates distribution centers in multiple states and two retail locations in the Pittsburgh, PA area.
      Prices and availability accurate as of publication date.
    • By carmcapriotto
      Thanks to our partners, NAPA TRACS and Promotive
      Managing your cash flow can feel overwhelming, but the Profit First system offers a fresh approach to organizing your finances. In this episode of Business by the Numbers, Hunt Demarest, CPA, dives into the pros, cons, and practical applications of Profit First for auto repair shops. Whether you’re new to the system or looking to refine your cash management strategy, this episode is packed with actionable insights.
      Key Takeaways:
      What is Profit First? Learn the basic framework of allocating revenue into multiple bank accounts to better manage cash flow. Benefits of Profit First: Understand how it can help you get a clear picture of your cash flow and improve financial decision-making. Challenges to Watch For: Discover why overcomplicating allocations or starting with too many accounts can hinder success. Practical Implementation: Hunt shares a simple three-account system tailored to auto repair --shops for effective cash management. Expert Tips: Adapt the system to your business size and goals, and avoid common pitfalls that lead to failure.
      Thanks to our partner, NAPA TRACS
      Did you know that NAPA TRACS has onsite training plus six days a week support?
      It all starts when a local representative meets with you to learn about your business and how you run it.  After all, it's your shop, so it's your choice.
      Let us prove to you that Tracs is the single best shop management system in the business.  Find NAPA TRACS on the Web at NAPATRACS.com
      Thanks to our partner, Promotive
      It’s time to hire a superstar for your business; what a grind you have in front of you. Introducing Promotive, a full-service staffing solution for your shop. Promotive has over 40 years of recruiting and automotive experience. If you need qualified technicians and service advisors and want to offload the heavy lifting, visit www.gopromotive.com.
      Paar Melis and Associates – Accountants Specializing in Automotive Repair
      Visit us Online: www.paarmelis.com
      Email Hunt: [email protected]
      Download a Copy of My Books Here:
      Wrenches to Write-Offs Your Perfect Shop 
      The Aftermarket Radio Network: https://aftermarketradionetwork.com/
      Remarkable Results Radio Podcast with Carm Capriotto https://remarkableresults.biz/
      Diagnosing the Aftermarket A to Z with Matt Fanslow https://mattfanslow.captivate.fm/
      Business by the Numbers with Hunt Demarest https://huntdemarest.captivate.fm/
      The Auto Repair Marketing Podcast with Kim and Brian Walker https://autorepairmarketing.captivate.fm/
      The Weekly Blitz with Chris Cotton https://chriscotton.captivate.fm/
      Speak Up! Effective Communication with Craig O'Neill https://craigoneill.captivate.fm/
      Click to go to the Podcast on Remarkable Results Radio
    • By carmcapriotto
      Podcasting isn’t about having all the answers—it’s about sharing the journey. In this episode, we tackle the hard truth: Podcast hosts don’t have it all figured out. From the insecurities of giving advice to the challenges of staying authentic, we explore what it really means to put yourself out there as a host.
      You’ll discover how to sift through advice, find what works for you, and embrace the imperfect process of learning and leading. If you’ve ever felt like you don’t have it all together, this episode will remind you—you’re not alone.
      Listen in for an honest discussion about navigating the auto repair industry, embracing authenticity, and growing through the challenges of imperfection!
      Thank you to our friends at RepairPal for providing you this episode. RepairPal’s Certified
      Network of shops are trusted by millions of customers each month. Learn more at
      RepairPal.com/shops
      Are you ready to convert clients to members? App fueled specializes in creating custom apps tailored specifically for auto repair businesses. Build client loyalty. Get started today with your own customer loyalty app. Visit Appfueled.com
      Lagniappe (Books, Links, Other Podcasts, etc)
      https://shopmarketingpros.com/ep-118-doing-video-every-day-for-a-month/ - Episode 118 VEDA
      https://agencyanalytics.com/blog/how-profit-first-helped-this-agency-scale - Profit First Was the Key to Our Agency’s Financial Transformation
      https://shopmarketingpros.com/ep-125-its-ok-to-dream-big-stop-playing-small/ - It’s OK to Dream Big (Stop Playing Small)
      Show Notes with Timestamps
      Introduction to the Episode (00:00:01)  Brian introduces the podcast and sets the theme about podcast hosts not having all the answers. Inspiration from Mike Allen's Post (00:00:10)  Discussion on how Mike Allen's humorous post sparked Brian's reflections on podcasting and advice-giving. Brian's Insecurities as a Host (00:01:15)  Brian shares his personal insecurities regarding his role as a podcast host and influencer. Critique of Influencers (00:02:26)  Brian expresses frustration with influencers who claim to have life figured out, relating it to his experiences. Sharing Personal Experiences (00:03:33)  Emphasis on the importance of sharing personal learning experiences rather than presenting oneself as an expert. Struggles with Advice-Giving (00:04:36)  Brian discusses his ongoing struggles with the advice he shares in his podcasts and posts. Imposter Syndrome (00:05:37)  Brian reflects on feelings of imposter syndrome when sharing advice on managing expenses and business practices. Going Against Popular Opinion (00:06:46)  Brian talks about the challenges of discussing unpopular business opinions and the reactions he receives. Sponsor Promotion: RepairPal (00:08:54)  Brian promotes RepairPal and its benefits for auto repair shops seeking new customers. Sponsor Promotion: App Fueled (00:09:55)  Introduction of App Fueled and its services for building customer loyalty apps for auto repair businesses. Rewarding Success Stories (00:10:59)  Brian shares the rewarding experience of hearing success stories from listeners implementing his advice. Discernment in Advice-Giving (00:12:03)  Brian advises listeners to discern the credibility of advice from various influencers and podcasters. Conclusion and Reflection (00:13:10)  Brian wraps up the discussion, emphasizing the importance of honesty in sharing experiences and insights.
      How To Get In Touch
      Group - Auto Repair Marketing Mastermind
      Website - shopmarketingpros.com 
      Facebook - facebook.com/shopmarketingpros 
      Get the Book - shopmarketingpros.com/book
      Instagram - @shopmarketingpros 
      Questions/Ideas - [email protected]
      Click to go to the Podcast on Remarkable Results Radio
    • By Changing The Industry
      Episode 199 - The Realities of Labor Rates and Technician Pay With Brandon Sloan
    • By Jay Huh
      Long story short, been in business about 2 years and started mobile. Current location for about a year, just opened up a second location about 3 weeks ago- HUGE step for me.
      In my area, auto shop locations are REALLY REALLY RARE. There'll be months before a single shop will pop up for lease.
      Well.. I was looking for auto equipment on craigslist and stumbled upon a listing of a shop moving and selling all his lifts. Found the location on loopnet- 5 bays, previous business extremely successful, great location, great price too....
      1st location hit record sales this past week, 2nd new location held its own (divided by week, came out on top after expenses). I got both stores running self sufficiently. I am pretty much maxed out and I hate taking out loans but I have a line of credit available. 
      Am I crazy to want to do this? 


  • Our Sponsors



×
×
  • Create New...