Quantcast
Jump to content


Gonzo
Gonzo

You Can Lead A Horse To Water... "leading the tech into replacing parts with out testing is never a good idea"

Sign in to follow this  

You Can Lead a Horse to Water…

 

 

 

 

 

As technician I work on symptoms of a problem, diagnosing said problem, and then make the appropriate repairs. It's hard to justify going out into the service bay and installing parts that a customer swears up and down is the cure to their aliments. The point being, I haven't diagnosed it. I haven't verified the complaint, nor determined if the part in question is at fault. It happens all the time, a customer will read something on a forum, talk to their friends, or perhaps they've gone to one of those parts stores that will code your car for you. You know the parts stores I'm talking about, the ones that carry every part from A to Z, the DIY'rs first stop when it comes to any kind of repair. I really think it's not wise to give partial answers to unsuspecting customers who will only take those "codes" and assume that a particular part is the problem, because it was mentioned in the description of the code.

 

 

 

Which leads to the eventual problem at the service counter. Here comes "Mr. Customer", armed with that tidbit of information which he has committed to memory. Now he's trying to lead me down that path where he thinks I'll just be so happy to oblige……not unlike the proverbial horse being lead to water. The usual scenario starts off with my asking, "What can I do for you today?"

 

 

 

"I need my GEM module replaced, how soon can you do it, and what will it cost?" the customer will ask.

 

 

 

 

 

"Well sir, I could give you prices, but I'd like to know how you arrived at this conclusion, before we just start stacking parts on top of a problem," I told him, "How about we begin with what doesn't work in the car, instead of what part we assume needs changed."

 

 

 

"My wipers don't work, my power windows don't work, and my radio doesn't work. It blew the fuse once," the customer tells me, "the fuse is marked GEM, so I know that's the problem."

 

 

 

I wouldn't dream of going to my doctor and telling him, "Put me in a new kidney." A smarter approach would be to tell the doctor the symptoms I'm having, rather than tell him what I think needs to be done.

 

 

 

"I have a battery drain also, and I know it's not the battery or the alternator," the customer goes on to tell me.

 

 

 

"There you go again sir; you're leading the symptom with a result before it's even tested. How about we just start with "It blows the GEM fuse, and I have a battery drain."

 

 

 

Once I had the vehicle in the service bay, I did some checking on all the systems he had mentioned. The wipers, radio, and windows all worked perfectly no… blown fuses, no "GEM" problem noted. Although there are a few things I will check when someone comes in mentioning something to do with the GEM module, and that's check for water damage on or near the fuse box. Luckily for this guy... it was dry, and no signs of any water or mineral stains on it. The next step was to check for any parasitic draws... none. OK then, might as well check the two things he said it wasn't. Hmm, the battery didn't pass load testing, and the alternator has a rather low output. Well, well, well... seems a little diagnostic work really did pay off this time.

 

 

 

No surprise to me, but it sure was to him.

 

 

 

Arm chair diagnostics hardly ever amount to much. This was no exception. I did explain to him how everything requires proper testing to determine the cause and cure for a problem. Even though I couldn't rule out the GEM module as the problem, he did get the idea that a number of other factors could cause the fuse to blow.

 

 

 

"I'll keep an eye on it," he told me.

 

 

 

Some people think they are actually helping the technician by telling them which part needs replaced. On the contrary, that's completely the opposite. I always picture a horse with blinders on when a customer tells me the exact component they want replaced. I need to see the whole picture, and not just what they think it is. Most of the time the true answer isn't as clear as changing a component, but a lot of these "helpful code reading parts stores" tend to inform their customer that it's just that...

 

 

 

"Change this part, and you'll be as good as new," the A to Z parts store guy will tell them. Then what does the customer tell me when they get to my shop? "Change this part; it'll be as good as new. I've been told that already by my mechanic." Seriously people, ya need to rethink this a bit more. Codes don't fix cars... technicians fix cars; they just use the codes as the road map to solve the problems.

 

 

 

An example of reading codes and coming up with the wrong answer happened a few days later. This time from a guy who insisted that his 95 Dodge computer is locked up.

 

 

 

"Locked up, what do you mean by that?" I asked.

 

 

 

"My mechanic said it's in "auto shut down", so I need to know how much you'll charge to put another one in?" the caller tells me.

 

 

 

I'm not sure who is leading who here. Is this guy's mechanic leading him into believing something is wrong with his PCM, or is the customer leading me into changing a part based on some nitwit's evaluation? (Probably both) I'm well aware of how the ASD relay works with the PCM on these Dodges, and I'll bet this is what he's referring to as far as "locked up", but I could be wrong. Of course diagnosing and testing is the answer here.

 

 

 

"My mechanic said it's either a timing chain or the computer that's bad," the caller goes on to say.

 

 

 

"Sir, my best advice to you is to remove your car from there... if your mechanic can't tell the difference between a timing chain problem and a PCM, you've got a more serious issue than your car's problem."

 

 

 

Needless to say, even mechanics can fall victim to the horse with blinders routine. Sometimes it's harder to ignore the advice of others, even when you know you should. People with the best intentions can have the wrong answer to an automotive problem, and they'll do everything they can think of to lead the technician down their path of poor choices.

 

 

 

Every tech I've ever met has had this happen to them a time or two. Past experience does pay off and makes you a little more cautious when dealing with similar issues.

 

 

 

Just like the horse… you can lead it to water… but you may not get the results you're expecting.

 

 

Keeping the customer aware who's the repairman in these cases is sometimes harder than it needs to be. Some people want to use the mechanic as their personnal parts changer and not as a technician. However, when the consumers "idea" of the repair doesn't work... guess who they'll blame for their failed diagnosis... you guessed it... you... the mechanic.

Sign in to follow this  


User Feedback

Recommended Comments

Gonzo, it’s getting worse and worse. Partly due to the economy with people attempting to perform repairs using the internet as their pipeline to the "All knowing and All wise" somewhere in the heavens. The other reason is the A to Z part stores claiming to have "advanced" knowledge in solving problems (like the way I phrased that?).

 

I think I told you about the BMW owner who had a charging system checked out by their mechanic and then rechecked by A to Z. He brought me the alternator and after a debate on why we need to test and diagnose the problem first, he reluctantly agreed to the diag. The alternator was fine; the connection at the back of the alternator was bad. A half hour labor charge only to repair. So, he wasted his money by buying an alternator that now he cannot return.

 

Good stuff Gonzo, not good for the BP, but good stuff!

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're truly in the "zone" Joe. LOL If we could take a little "Pep" out of some of these boys ... we might be able to see a difference in the action taken well in "Advance" of a customer being told the wrong information, or at least get all these parts stores to certify that their "code readers" are qualified to even operate a code reader properly. Diagnosing a problem is so far from code reading that it's hard for me to understand how anyone would even think that reading a code is the answer to a problem.

 

Thanks for the comments Joe. keep those comments coming. good stuff buddy!

 

 

Gonzo, it's getting worse and worse. Partly due to the economy with people attempting to perform repairs using the internet as their pipeline to the "All knowing and All wise" somewhere in the heavens. The other reason is the A to Z part stores claiming to have "advanced" knowledge in solving problems (like the way I phrased that?).

 

I think I told you about the BMW owner who had a charging system checked out by their mechanic and then rechecked by A to Z. He brought me the alternator and after a debate on why we need to test and diagnose the problem first, he reluctantly agreed to the diag. The alternator was fine; the connection at the back of the alternator was bad. A half hour labor charge only to repair. So, he wasted his money by buying an alternator that now he cannot return.

 

Good stuff Gonzo, not good for the BP, but good stuff!

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...